The Relationship Between Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy is a treatment approach based on the principle of incremental allergen exposure to achieve desensitization. Recently, oral immunotherapy has been introduced as a treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy. Some patients receiving oral immunotherapy for food allergy may develop eosinophilic esophagitis. Here, we summarize the literature examining this association, its treatment, and outcomes and discuss possible explanations for this clinical phenomenon. We further identify potential associations with aeroallergen sensitivity and other forms of immunotherapy including subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy. Finally, we discuss management of immunotherapy-induced eosinophilic esophagitis. Epicutaneous immunotherapy is highlighted as an area of therapeutic investigation.

Ethical Implications of Continuing Oral Immunotherapy After the Development of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic inflammatory disease requiring maintenance therapy. Traditionally, EoE has been a contraindication to oral immunotherapy (OIT) and a rationale for discontinuing treatment because OIT may induce EoE. Most, but not all patients with OIT-induced EoE experience symptom resolution and histologic remission after discontinuing OIT. Recent studies report OIT continuation even after EoE onset, despite the previously accepted standard of care. This creates clinical as well as ethical challenges for allergists treating these patients. Considering the published literature on EoE and OIT and the primary medical ethics principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, we discuss the ethical implications of pursuing desensitization despite the potential complications associated with EoE. When ethical principles are in opposition, shared decision-making should be employed to determine whether OIT should be continued after an EoE diagnosis. This article highlights the ethical dilemmas allergists face when determining whether patients with a diagnosis of EoE should continue OIT.

Usefulness of the lupus low disease activity state as a treatment target in childhood-onset SLE.

OBJECTIVE: Treat-to-target (T2T) strategies are advocated to improve prognosis in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Proposed T2T states include SLEDAI score of <4 (SLEDAI-LD), limited corticosteroid use (low-CS), and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS). We sought to compare T2T states for their association with cSLE prognosis under consideration of relevant disease characteristics such as pre-existing damage, race and lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Longitudinal data from 165 patients enrolled in the Cincinnati Lupus Registry were included. LN presence was based on renal biopsy, and patients were followed up until 18 years of age. RESULTS: The 165 patients (LN: 45, white: 95) entered the registry within a median of 0 (IQR: 0-1) year post diagnosis and were followed up for a median of 4 (IQR: 2-5) years during which 80%, 92% and 94% achieved LLDAS, low-CS and SLEDAI-LD. Patients with LN were significantly less likely to achieve any T2T state (all p<0.03) and required a significantly longer time to reach them (all p<0.0001). Over the study period, patients maintained low-CS, SLEDAI-LD or LLDAS for a median of 76% (IQR: 48%-100%), 86% (IQR: 55%-100%) or 39% (IQR: 13%-64%) of their follow-up. Significant predictors of failure to maintain LLDAS included LN (p≤0.0062), pre-existing damage (p≤0.0271) and non-white race (p≤0.0013). There were 22%, 20% and 13% of patients who reached SLEDAI-LD, CS-low and LLDAS and nonetheless acquired new damage. Patients with LN had a higher risk of new damage than patients without LN even if achieving low-CS (p=0.009) or LLDAS (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LN and pre-existing damage are at higher risk of increased future damage acquisition, even if achieving a T2T state such as LLDAS. Among proposed common T2T states, the LLDAS is the hardest to achieve and maintain. The LLDAS may be considered the preferred T2T measure as it conveys the highest protection from acquiring additional disease damage.

Renal length and inulin clearance in the radiologically normal single kidney.

Compensatory hypertrophy of a single functioning kidney is well described and has been shown to occur in utero. The long-term effects of hypertrophy and hyperfiltration in this situation are unknown. This study defined the growth parameters for single kidneys during childhood and correlated them with inulin clearance. Patients were those who had a radiologically "normal" single kidney, where the contralateral kidney was known to be non-functioning from infancy. Data were obtained from 74 children (40 boys and 34 girls) drawn from a registry of cases with a single kidney, and in whom simultaneous measurements of inulin clearance and renal length had been made at around 5, 10, and 16 years of age. Renal length was taken as the maximal bipolar measurement using real-time ultrasound scan. Inulin clearance was by continuous infusion technique. Nomograms for single kidney growth were determined against age, height, weight, and body surface area. Renal growth was correlated with inulin clearance. Renal length was found to correlate best with body surface area ( r=0.85, P<0.001), but this was not significantly superior to correlations with age, height, or weight separately. Inulin clearance per body surface area correlated positively with standardized renal length, i.e., Z score for renal length normalized for body surface area ( r=0.53, P<0.001). The larger kidneys have a higher glomerular filtration rate. Provided that the nephron number in the single kidney is similar to that in a paired kidney, single kidneys are hypertrophied and the single nephron glomerular filtration rate is likely to be abnormally high in these children.